11 December 2015

Government Should Encourage Citizens To Drive New Cars

By and large, Malaysia is a prosperous country. But the same may not be true of its 28 million (and counting) citizens. Many of the citizens are not well to do and cannot afford to change cars on a whim and fancy. However, it is clear that driving new cars helps to lower carbon emissions, and newer cars are also known to be more fuel efficient. So why isn't the government of Malaysia helping its citizens to drive new cars?

There are, indeed, several ways to help citizens drive new cars. One of these is to lower the import duty for foreign vehicles. (Of course, that might cause a run-in with Proton, which is a local car manufacturer, but it would benefit Proton to be more competitive.) Some of these foreign-made cars can be more fuel efficient (hybrid and electric cars?) than the locally produced cars. Another is to encourage trade-ins through government incentives. ("Trade in your car today! Get a 20% matching grant from the MOT....") And a third is for local producers to manufacture cars with government subsidy, therefore allowing them to sell to Malaysians at rock-bottom prices.

There are drawbacks to driving older vehicles. But many of us drive them anyway, because we tell ourselves that we look cool like Warren Buffett (or, for some Malaysians, the late and great Nik Aziz). One of these drawbacks is the part failure that owners face. This part or that part will wear out and break down, causing untold grief in suddenly necessitated expenses. Another drawback is petrol consumption. Your older, sexier beast of a vehicle will roar on the road. And it will guzzle that gallon of oil whenever you fill her up. Yet a third drawback is the cost of retrofitting the car with modern gadgetry. If you want air-conditioning, remote locking, keyless ignitions, and such, all in your old junk on wheels, be prepared to spend money. If you decide to save on money, you're due for a hot, sweaty drive on the streets of Kuala Lumpur. (It's rainy season now, so read this article again in 6 months time and see if you agree.)

If the government does not agree that citizens should drive new cars, it may be of the opinion that less cars on the road is better for the environment. The government cannot ban cars. But it may consider reducing the number of cars on the road. Workers power the economy, and workers need to get to work. Thus, workers need to commute. Commuting, unfortunately, requires a car, unless there is good public transportation at the place you want to go to.

In an article from Catchnews (1) it was stated that in India, the Delhi government has decided to reduce cars on the road by banning cars with odd and even numbers on alternate days. This would theoretically halve the number of vehicles on the road if everybody owned only one car.

However, another article from Catchnews (2) stated that a similar effort was carried out in Mexico City between 1984 to 1993. The carbon emissions actually increased because many car owners purchased a second, older car so that they could drive their second car when they could not drive their first.

I hope that the government of Malaysia will pay heed and give incentives to Malaysians to trade in their cars. Local car makers will have a field day and their sales figures will go up. Government makes more tax from local car makers. Malaysians get to buy new cars at more affordable prices and get rid of their old piece of junk. Everybody wins. Everybody is happy. And elections are coming soon.

References
  1. Delhi Pollution: Odd and even number vehicles to be on roads on alternate days from January 2016, by SPEED NEWS DESK. Published 4th December 2015. URL: http://www.catchnews.com/social-sector/delhi-pollution-odd-and-even-number-vehicles-to-be-on-roads-on-alternate-days-from-january-2016-1449225421.html
  2. What Bogota, Mexico City, Beijing's experiences tell us about Delhi's even-odd policy, by Nihar Gokhale. Published 7th December 2015. URL: http://www.catchnews.com/environment-news/what-bogota-mexico-city-beijing-s-experiences-tell-us-about-delhi-s-even-odd-policy-1449428409.html

Metro-style Railways for Other Major Cities in Malaysia?

As the title of this post suggests, we require Metro-style railway systems in other major cities of the country. In many major cities outside Kuala Lumpur, many places are not reachable directly through public railway. We have to emulate the Metro subway in the major cities of the world - which link every nook and cranny of the city.

Therefore, it is important that the Transport Ministry and the Public Works ministry of this country to make a real effort to create railway systems in other cities (other than Kuala Lumpur) which link all corners of those cities.

KL Sentral may serve as a model for future development. However, KL Sentral only links the KTM, the Rapid railway, and the high-speed railway to the airport. It would be more effective for commuters if there were more links between cities through alternate railway lines.

In any case, the railway system which links major parts of the nation's capital means that Kuala Lumpur is well placed to cater to the needs of those who commute to work. The same may not be true of other major cities in Malaysia. We are yet to see similar systems being put in place in cities such as Georgetown, Johor Bahru, Kuching, and Kota Kinabalu.

This means that those workers who commute to work in those cities have no choice but to consider either driving, carpooling, and buses. All of these modes of transportation require petrol. If those cities had railway systems, the population in the cities can save some money on petrol.

We all know that times are hard and everybody needs to save a little bit more. Putting up intra-city railway systems for easy commuting will help people from other major cities. At the same time, those cities become more livable and their economies will improve. This may lead to more growth in those cities. There's a good reason why Kuala Lumpur is the preferred place for young people to work, especially those who may not have their own vehicles yet.

Note: An article from India says that a Metro-style railway requires at least 800,000 passengers per day just to break even. The said article further suggests that, in India, the rush to lay down Metro-style railway tracks may be causing untold losses to authorities. Link to article: http://www.catchnews.com/india-news/small-cities-are-queuing-up-for-metro-rail-how-many-can-really-afford-it-1449520701.html (Details: Small city alert: The metro story no one is talking about, by Skand Vivek Dhar. Published 8th December 2015 on CatchNews.)